DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShekhawat, Sushila-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-15T05:38:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-15T05:38:11Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10509208.2021.1980364-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10353-
dc.description.abstractBiography has always been practiced in the history of cinema. Ian Christie, in his article A life on film, mentions that “the biographical film is essentially as old as cinema itself, both within and beyond the Anglo-American context” (as quoted by Minier and Pennacchia Citation2016, 288). But, film studies has never actually considered the biopic as a genre that has its own conventions and stages of development. Despite the historical evidence, many film critics still hesitate to acknowledge the biographical film as a distinct genre. Steve Neale (Citation2000) also points out that the biopic usually lacks critical—rather than industrial esteem and it has rarely been a focus of serious analysis. Robert A. Rosenstone (Citation2007) gives voice to a very similar view, and comments on the high-brow prejudice against the biopic as an allegedly low-quality popular product: “Nobody ever has everything good to say about the biographical- a form usually dismissed with a kind of sneer as the ‘biopic’en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectHumanitiesen_US
dc.subjectBiopicsen_US
dc.subjectHistory of cinemaen_US
dc.titleStatistical Style Analysis of Hindi Biopics: Exploring the Genre Conventions in Recent Yearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Humanities and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.