Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10456
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nair, Harikrishnan Gopinadhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Bhattacharya, Somdatta | |
dc.contributor.author | Shukla, Tanu | |
dc.contributor.author | Yadav, Anupam | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-21T06:52:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-21T06:52:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2347631117706261 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10456 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article brings together critical perspectives on a broad range of issues that emerge from a reading of the National Policy on Education 2016. The issues vary from accountability to transdisciplinarity and from the marginalization of transgender people to value education. Such a complex task of critiquing this policy document cannot be accomplished by an individual alone. This task must be borne by a team of scholars with training in diverse fields. Working in a team however generates divergences as well as convergences. Yet no attempt has been made to iron out the creases emanating from differences in opinions, nor persist with the search for an underlying singularity, nor enforce a consensus. Such is the uncertain nature of the task of reforming higher education. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sage | en_US |
dc.subject | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | National Policy on Education 2016 | en_US |
dc.subject | Higher Education | en_US |
dc.title | Critical Perspectives on the National Policy on Education 2016 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Humanities and Social Sciences |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.