A Corrigendum to “Hereditary Properties Between a Ring and Its Maximal Subrings”

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/xmlui/handle/123456789/11459

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Kumar, Rahul	-
dc.date.accessioned	2023-08-16T11:05:16Z	-
dc.date.available	2023-08-16T11:05:16Z	-
dc.date.issued	2018-11	-
dc.identifier.uri	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11253-018-1524-x	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11459	-
dc.description.abstract	Let R be a commutative ring with identity. In A. Azarang, O. A. S. Karamzadeh, and A. Namazi, [Ukr. Math. J., 65, No. 7, 981–994 (2013) (Proposition 3.1)], it was proved that if R is an integral domain and S is a maximal subring of R integrally closed in R, then dim(S) = 1 implies that dim(R) = 1 if and only if (S : R) = 0. An example is given, which shows that the above-mentioned proposition is not true.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Springer	en_US
dc.subject	Mathematics	en_US
dc.subject	Hereditary	en_US
dc.title	A Corrigendum to “Hereditary Properties Between a Ring and Its Maximal Subrings”	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Department of Mathematics

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.