Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/11465Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Rahul | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-17T06:15:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-17T06:15:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13366-020-00508-5 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11465 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In this note, we show that a part of Ratliff (Proc Am Math Soc 101(3):395–402, 1987, Remark 2.2) is not correct. Some conditions are given under which the same holds. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.subject | Mathematics | en_US |
| dc.subject | Noetherian rings | en_US |
| dc.subject | Normal pair of rings | en_US |
| dc.subject | Adjacent rings | en_US |
| dc.title | A note on imbedded prime divisors | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Mathematics | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.