DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/12097
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRai, Aakash Chand-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-26T10:03:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-26T10:03:18Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969717316935-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/12097-
dc.description.abstractLow-cost sensor technology can potentially revolutionise the area of air pollution monitoring by providing high-density spatiotemporal pollution data. Such data can be utilised for supplementing traditional pollution monitoring, improving exposure estimates, and raising community awareness about air pollution. However, data quality remains a major concern that hinders the widespread adoption of low-cost sensor technology. Unreliable data may mislead unsuspecting users and potentially lead to alarming consequences such as reporting acceptable air pollutant levels when they are above the limits deemed safe for human health. This article provides scientific guidance to the end-users for effectively deploying low-cost sensors for monitoring air pollution and people's exposure, while ensuring reasonable data quality. We review the performance characteristics of several low-cost particle and gas monitoring sensors and provide recommendations to end-users for making proper sensor selection by summarizing the capabilities and limitations of such sensors. The challenges, best practices, and future outlook for effectively deploying low-cost sensors, and maintaining data quality are also discussed. For data quality assurance, a two-stage sensor calibration process is recommended, which includes laboratory calibration under controlled conditions by the manufacturer supplemented with routine calibration checks performed by the end-user under final deployment conditions. For large sensor networks where routine calibration checks are impractical, statistical techniques for data quality assurance should be utilised. Further advancements and adoption of sophisticated mathematical and statistical techniques for sensor calibration, fault detection, and data quality assurance can indeed help to realise the promised benefits of a low-cost air pollution sensor network.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectPollution exposureen_US
dc.subjectHuman healthen_US
dc.subjectOutdoor pollution sensingen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental sensingen_US
dc.subjectReal-time exposureen_US
dc.titleEnd-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoringen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.