DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14253
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Madhukar-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T08:34:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-13T08:34:28Z-
dc.date.issued2007-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843710700622X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/xmlui/handle/123456789/14253-
dc.description.abstractWe revisit the well-known topics of self- and induced-screening in an otherwise isotropic neutral plasma/colloid. It is pointed out that the standard Debye–Hückel (DH) theory (ignoring finite size effects) suffers from many ambiguities related to net ionic numbers, total charge of the system, role of the electrostatic Gauss law, short-distance behaviour of the potential and incorrectly normalized pair correlation functions. We give a new formulation (incorporating finite size effects) such that ionic numbers are maintained, the total charge of the system has physically correct value, the Gauss law boundary conditions are rigorously obeyed, short-distance behaviour of the potential is guaranteed automatically, and correlation functions are correctly normalized. Numerical differences between the two approaches show up if the screening length μ−1 becomes comparable to the size R of the system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.subjectDebye screeningen_US
dc.subjectPlasma/colloiden_US
dc.subjectPoisson equationen_US
dc.subjectGauss lawen_US
dc.subjectBoltzmann distributionen_US
dc.titleDebye screening versus Gauss law in electrostatics: Finite size effectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Physics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.