DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16497
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAsati, Abhijit-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T09:19:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-26T09:19:31Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10080818-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16497-
dc.description.abstractIn the lower VLSI process technologies, to design the low-power VLSI circuits selection of suitable logic style becomes important to minimize the chip’s power to meet the power density need with minimum sacrifice in the speed. This study’s emphasis is on the design and optimization of digital code converters. To compare propagation delay, power consumption and power delay product (PDP) at 32 nm and 22 nm process technologies, sub-threshold (ST) logic style implementations of Gray code to Binary code (GB), Binary code to Gray code (BG), and BCD code to Excess-3 code (BE3) code converters are used. These implementations are compared with Efficient Charge Recovery Logic (ECRL) and static CMOS logic style implementationsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.subjectEEEen_US
dc.subjectAdiabaticen_US
dc.subjectLow poweren_US
dc.subjectECRLen_US
dc.subjectCode convertersen_US
dc.subjectSingle power clocken_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of ST, ECRL and Static Logic Style at Different Process Technologiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.