DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16772
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRao, V. Ramgopal-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T10:47:19Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-13T10:47:19Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv126%2Fi11%2F-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16772-
dc.description.abstractIndia rankings released by the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) since 2016, plays a vital role in the assessment of higher education institutions (HEIs) in the country. While the NIRF rankings aim to enhance transparency and accountability, the present study has identified several inconsistencies, thus raising concerns about their reliability. These include huge fluctuations in the rankings, overemphasis on bibliometrics neglecting non-traditional research outputs, subjective nature of perception rankings that introduces biases, challenges in the regional diversity metric, overlooking teaching quality, inadequate transparency in methodology, questions about data integrity and limited global benchmarking. This study emphasizes on dialogue, refinement and increased transparency to ensure that the NIRF rankings evolve into a reliable benchmark for the diverse landscape of Indian higher education.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCurrent Scienceen_US
dc.subjectBibliometric assessmenten_US
dc.subjectHigher Education Institutionsen_US
dc.subjectPerception systemsen_US
dc.subjectRanking fluctuationsen_US
dc.subjectRegional diversityen_US
dc.titleUnpacking inconsistencies in the NIRF rankingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.