DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/xmlui/handle/123456789/2739
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Ram Kinkar-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T11:35:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-12T11:35:49Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11-25-
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qua.21901-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2739-
dc.description.abstractIn the present article, we report a comparative study between the Hirshfeld and Mulliken population analysis schemes (abbreviated as HPA and MPA, respectively). Trends of atomic charges derived from these two population analysis schemes are compared with those expected from other commonly used chemical concepts like electronegativity, inductive effects, and resonance effects. Although previous studies on intramolecular reactivity sequences demonstrated that HPA generates reliable and non-negative (and thus physically more realistic) condensed Fukui function (FF) values, the present study reveals problems with the HPA charge partitioning technique. Specifically, HPA fails to reproduce reliable intermolecular and intramolecular charge trends in several systems. Reasons for the success and failure of HPA are discussed and a method for improving the Hirshfeld charge partitioning is proposed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2009en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.subjectHirshfelden_US
dc.subjectMulliken populationen_US
dc.subjectChemical intuitionen_US
dc.titleAre the Hirshfeld and Mulliken population analysis schemes consistent with chemical intuition?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.