DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3547
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarai, Sudhir Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T11:27:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-11T11:27:49Z-
dc.date.issued1999-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954181098000211-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3547-
dc.description.abstractThe use of machine learning (ML), and in particular, artificial neural networks (ANN), in engineering applications has increased dramatically over the last years. However, by and large, the development of such applications or their report lack proper evaluation. Deficient evaluation practice was observed in the general neural networks community and again in engineering applications through a survey we conducted of articles published in AI in Engineering and elsewhere. This status hinders understanding and prevents progress. This article goal is to remedy this situation. First, several evaluation methods are discussed with their relative qualities. Second, these qualities are illustrated by using the methods to evaluate ANN performance in two engineering problems. Third, a systematic evaluation procedure for ML is discussed. This procedure will lead to better evaluation of studies, and consequently to improved research and practice in the area of ML in engineering applications.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsieveren_US
dc.subjectCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectArtificial neural networksen_US
dc.subjectResearch methodologyen_US
dc.subjectPerformance evaluationen_US
dc.subjectStatistical testsen_US
dc.subjectModelingen_US
dc.titleEvaluating machine learning models for engineering problemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.