DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/xmlui/handle/123456789/8924
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBal, Debi Prasad-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-03T03:56:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-03T03:56:14Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-18-00220.html-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8924-
dc.description.abstractDe Vita and Trachanas's (hereafter DV-T, 2016) paper published in (Energy Economics, Volume 56, May 2016, pages, 150-160) criticizes Bal and Rath's paper (Energy Economics, Volume 51, September 2015, pages, 149-156) (hereafter, BR, 2015) by undertaking a ‘pure replication' and a ‘reanalysis' using (BR, 2015) data set. The aim of this paper is to reassess (BR, 2015) by providing comments and additional evidence. We revisit (BR, 2015) with the aim of applying additional unit root, cointegration and nonlinear causality tests. The results derived from these supplementary tests clearly reveal that the oil price series is non-stationary at level. The bivariate noisy Mackey-Glass model proposed by Kyrtsou and Terraza (2003) reveals bi-directional non-linear causality exists between real oil price and exchange rate in case of China, whereas for India, only unidirectional nonlinear causality running from oil price to exchange rateen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEconomics Bulletinen_US
dc.subjectEconomics and Financeen_US
dc.subjectCrude oil priceen_US
dc.titleNonlinear Causality between Crude Oil Price and Exchange Rate: A Comparative Study of China and India-A Reassessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Economics and Finance

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.