Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8928
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bal, Debi Prasad | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-03T06:07:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-03T06:07:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1759-3441.12132 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8928 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we investigated whether the government debt caused a burden for India over the period 1970–2013. We achieved this goal using Bohn's (1998) hypothesis in a structural VAR framework. This study did not find evidence to support Bohn's hypothesis in the context of India because no statistically significant relationship between public debt and gross primary deficit was found. Second, this study observed a positive response of interest payments due to the shock of public debt, which is not surprising. Third, a positive shock of public debt was statistically significant and negatively affected developmental expenditure. Similarly, interest payments negatively affected the gross primary deficit. We concluded that public debt in India was not a burden for the country. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.subject | Economics and Finance | en_US |
dc.subject | Economic Growth | en_US |
dc.title | Is Public Debt a Burden for India? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Economics and Finance |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.