| dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Rahul | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-16T11:05:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-16T11:05:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11253-018-1524-x | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11459 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Let R be a commutative ring with identity. In A. Azarang, O. A. S. Karamzadeh, and A. Namazi, [Ukr. Math. J., 65, No. 7, 981–994 (2013) (Proposition 3.1)], it was proved that if R is an integral domain and S is a maximal subring of R integrally closed in R, then dim(S) = 1 implies that dim(R) = 1 if and only if (S : R) = 0. An example is given, which shows that the above-mentioned proposition is not true. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.subject | Mathematics | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hereditary | en_US |
| dc.title | A Corrigendum to “Hereditary Properties Between a Ring and Its Maximal Subrings” | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||