DSpace Repository

Comparative analysis of mechanical properties for mono and poly-crystalline copper under nanoindentation – Insights from molecular dynamics simulations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Roy, Tribeni
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-19T06:28:59Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-19T06:28:59Z
dc.date.issued 2022-02
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254058421013420
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/12513
dc.description.abstract Crystallographic orientation and grain size for monocrystalline and polycrystalline materials respectively play a critical role in defining their mechanical behaviour under nanoindentation. To understand their effects on mechanical properties, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations help in revealing the underlying physical phenomena governing the nanoindentation behaviour. This paper attempts to comparatively analyse and study the effects of crystallographic orientations of monocrystalline copper {(100), (110) and (111)} and critical grain size of polycrystalline copper on the nanoindentation response using MD simulations. The results obtained for indentation load vs. depth curve, hardness, dislocations, and elastic recovery were analysed for comparison. Cu(111) exhibited an average hardness of 12.62 GPa, which is 18.27% more than that of Cupoly. The pile-ups of 8 Å size were observed in Cupoly; and this was higher than any of copper system studied here. The dislocation extraction algorithm (DXA) analysis revealed that the total dislocations in Cu(111) was 34.23% and 153.8% lower than that of Cu(110) and Cupoly, respectively. Cu(111) comprised of highest Stair-rod dislocation along with LC and Hirth locks. Furthermore, a prismatic loop comprised of sessile dislocations also appeared in Cu(111). The elastic depth recovery rate for Cu(100) was 52.75%, 41.60% and 40.66% higher than that of Cu(110), Cu(111) and Cupoly, respectively. This study revealed that the nanoindentation based mechanical performances of monocrystalline copper systems, specifically Cu(111) were superior to any other copper systems. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Mechanical Engineering en_US
dc.subject Nanoindentation en_US
dc.subject Crystallographic orientations en_US
dc.subject Molecular dynamics en_US
dc.subject Hardness en_US
dc.subject Dislocation en_US
dc.subject Elastic recovery en_US
dc.title Comparative analysis of mechanical properties for mono and poly-crystalline copper under nanoindentation – Insights from molecular dynamics simulations en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account