DSpace Repository

Debye screening versus Gauss law in electrostatics: Finite size effects

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mishra, Madhukar
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-13T08:34:28Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-13T08:34:28Z
dc.date.issued 2007-10
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843710700622X
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/xmlui/handle/123456789/14253
dc.description.abstract We revisit the well-known topics of self- and induced-screening in an otherwise isotropic neutral plasma/colloid. It is pointed out that the standard Debye–Hückel (DH) theory (ignoring finite size effects) suffers from many ambiguities related to net ionic numbers, total charge of the system, role of the electrostatic Gauss law, short-distance behaviour of the potential and incorrectly normalized pair correlation functions. We give a new formulation (incorporating finite size effects) such that ionic numbers are maintained, the total charge of the system has physically correct value, the Gauss law boundary conditions are rigorously obeyed, short-distance behaviour of the potential is guaranteed automatically, and correlation functions are correctly normalized. Numerical differences between the two approaches show up if the screening length μ−1 becomes comparable to the size R of the system. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Physics en_US
dc.subject Debye screening en_US
dc.subject Plasma/colloid en_US
dc.subject Poisson equation en_US
dc.subject Gauss law en_US
dc.subject Boltzmann distribution en_US
dc.title Debye screening versus Gauss law in electrostatics: Finite size effects en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account