dc.contributor.author |
Ranganayakulu, Chennu |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-08-17T04:15:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-08-17T04:15:44Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-05 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/thermalscienceapplication/article/16/5/051007/1198180/An-In-Depth-Comparison-of-Straight-and-Wavy |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/xmlui/handle/123456789/15277 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper presents extensive fluid flow and Heat-Transfer studies conducted using a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) package known as CFD-ACE® to elaborate and expand on the reference studies available for ceramic-compact counterflow microchannel heat exchangers (MCHEs). The computational 3D model was developed using an experimentally tested MCHE and validated with experimental data with 3–5% variation for hot fluid and 6–12% variation for cold fluid for the entire design of experiments (DoEs). This study aimed to identify the performance of novel microchannel shapes using numerical analysis. The MCHE has good heat exchange properties, a compact design at industrial throughput, and a lower inner volume. During the study and identification of novel channel shapes, the segmented wavy MCHE was evaluated. The results were compared with those of the same volume and area straight MCHE baseline design under various identical operating conditions. Although the performance in terms of effectiveness is increased up to ∼12–25% in wavy MCHE with respect to straight MCHE simultaneously, the pressure drop is also increased by ∼60–80% under the same operating conditions. Therefore, performance and trade-offs are required to make the correct decision regarding feasibility. The effectiveness of the heat-transfer enhancement was also evaluated by plotting the heat-transfer coefficient ratio with respect to the pressure ratio of the two designs under identical operating conditions. This numerical study clearly indicates that wavy channels are better from the thermal performance point of view, whereas straight channels are better from the pumping power point of view, and the quantitative values are presented in graphical form. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
ASME |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Mechanical Engineering |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Microchannel heat exchangers (MCHEs) |
en_US |
dc.title |
An In-Depth Comparison of Straight and Wavy Microchannel Heat Exchangers |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |