DSpace Repository

Comparative Analysis of ST, ECRL and Static Logic Style at Different Process Technologies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Asati, Abhijit
dc.date.accessioned 2024-11-26T09:19:31Z
dc.date.available 2024-11-26T09:19:31Z
dc.date.issued 2023-04
dc.identifier.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10080818
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16497
dc.description.abstract In the lower VLSI process technologies, to design the low-power VLSI circuits selection of suitable logic style becomes important to minimize the chip’s power to meet the power density need with minimum sacrifice in the speed. This study’s emphasis is on the design and optimization of digital code converters. To compare propagation delay, power consumption and power delay product (PDP) at 32 nm and 22 nm process technologies, sub-threshold (ST) logic style implementations of Gray code to Binary code (GB), Binary code to Gray code (BG), and BCD code to Excess-3 code (BE3) code converters are used. These implementations are compared with Efficient Charge Recovery Logic (ECRL) and static CMOS logic style implementations en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.subject EEE en_US
dc.subject Adiabatic en_US
dc.subject Low power en_US
dc.subject ECRL en_US
dc.subject Code converters en_US
dc.subject Single power clock en_US
dc.title Comparative Analysis of ST, ECRL and Static Logic Style at Different Process Technologies en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account