| dc.description.abstract |
Assessing individual exposure to PM2.5 (particulate matter of aerodynamic diameter lesser than 2.5 μm) requires precise monitoring of PM2.5 concentrations at specific geographical and temporal scales. This demand is met globally by low-cost particulate matter sensors, although calibrating them is difficult. In this study, four low-cost PM sensors, Sharp GP2Y1010AU0F, Honeywell HPMA115S0-XXX, Plantower PMSA003-A, and Sensirion SPS30, were calibrated and tested using various aerosols. The calibration method has three steps: individual (considering each sensor independently to a single aerosol type; n = 1), combined (all sensors for a specific model together for a specific aerosol type; n = 4), and generic (all sensors for a given model together to all aerosols; n = 16). Sensor responses are processed using linear, quadratic, power-law, and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms in each calibration stage. Performance metrics, including coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and percentage coefficient of variation (% CV), were utilized for assessment. Amongst all the four tested sensors, the Sensirion SPS30 sensors gave the best performance with a minimum R2 value of 0.911 when calibrated with a generic ANN calibration algorithm. Also, the MAPE was less than 10 %, and the RMSE was less than 7 % when exposed to different particles. Sensirion SPS30 showed the lowest inter-sensor variability with % CV less than 6 %. Sensors identified monodisperse polystyrene latex (PSL) particle size in the investigation. Regardless of exposure to 0.3, 0.46, 0.60, or 1.0 μm PSL, the reported number size distribution for the PMSA003 sensor remained consistent and did not align with the results from Grimm. As the PSL size rose, the SPS30 size distribution changed towards larger particle sizes, although it did not always match Grimm data. As the PSL size increased, the sensor's PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 mass proportions altered. |
en_US |