DSpace Repository

Machine learning-based prediction of axial load and strain capacities for circular FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Singh, Shamsher Bahadur
dc.contributor.author Barai, Sudhir Kumar
dc.date.accessioned 2026-05-11T05:44:30Z
dc.date.available 2026-05-11T05:44:30Z
dc.date.issued 2025-12
dc.identifier.uri https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15376494.2025.2585510
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/21302
dc.description.abstract Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns (hybrid DSTCs) are innovative composite columns offering high strength, ductility, corrosion resistance, and lightweight due to hollow cross-section. Despite extensive experimental, numerical, and analytical studies, accurately predicting the behavior using traditional methods remains challenging. Experimental and numerical methods are costly and time-consuming, while analytical approaches are conservative and may not effectively capture complex and nonlinear relationships. This study compares five machine learning (ML) models with two existing empirical equations for predicting the axial load and axial strain of circular hybrid DSTCs. An extensive dataset of 249 specimens from the literature was used to train and test ML models. Five ML models, namely, multiple linear regression (MLR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbors (KNNs), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were trained using eight input parameters. Results indicate that the XGBoost model achieved the highest accuracy in predicting both axial load and strain capacities, with R2 values of 0.87 and 0.96, respectively. Among the empirical equations, Louk Fanggi and Ozbakkaloglu’s equation performed better than traditional ML models such as MLR and DT for axial load prediction, achieving an R2 value of 0.785, compared to 0.72 for MLR and 0.74 for DT. Feature importance analysis further identified the significant influence of geometric parameters on axial load prediction and material properties on axial strain prediction. Additionally, a user-friendly web application is developed, allowing users to easily predict the axial load and strain of circular hybrid DSTCs, demonstrating ML’s efficiency as a data-driven alternative to empirical approaches. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis en_US
dc.subject Civil engineering en_US
dc.subject Axial load–strain capacity en_US
dc.subject Double-skin tubular columns (DSTCs) en_US
dc.subject Existing equations en_US
dc.subject Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) en_US
dc.subject Machine learning (ML) en_US
dc.title Machine learning-based prediction of axial load and strain capacities for circular FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account