DSpace Repository

Are the Hirshfeld and Mulliken population analysis schemes consistent with chemical intuition?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Roy, Ram Kinkar
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-12T11:35:49Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-12T11:35:49Z
dc.date.issued 2008-11-25
dc.identifier.uri https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qua.21901
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2739
dc.description.abstract In the present article, we report a comparative study between the Hirshfeld and Mulliken population analysis schemes (abbreviated as HPA and MPA, respectively). Trends of atomic charges derived from these two population analysis schemes are compared with those expected from other commonly used chemical concepts like electronegativity, inductive effects, and resonance effects. Although previous studies on intramolecular reactivity sequences demonstrated that HPA generates reliable and non-negative (and thus physically more realistic) condensed Fukui function (FF) values, the present study reveals problems with the HPA charge partitioning technique. Specifically, HPA fails to reproduce reliable intermolecular and intramolecular charge trends in several systems. Reasons for the success and failure of HPA are discussed and a method for improving the Hirshfeld charge partitioning is proposed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2009 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.subject Chemistry en_US
dc.subject Hirshfeld en_US
dc.subject Mulliken population en_US
dc.subject Chemical intuition en_US
dc.title Are the Hirshfeld and Mulliken population analysis schemes consistent with chemical intuition? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account