BITS Faculty Publications
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://localhost:4000/handle/123456789/1867
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Experimental studies of catalyst deactivation due to carbon and sulphur during CO2 reforming of CH4 over Ni washcoated monolith in the presence of H2S(Wiley, 2021-07-18) Srinivas, AppariThis study presents the CO2 reforming of CH4 over Ni coated monolith catalyst at 800°C and 101.325 kPa. The high CH4 to CO2 ratio employed in this study is similar to the CH4:CO2 ratio of >1 found in biogas. Cordierite monolith samples (0.258 channels per m2) washcoated with alumina are used for the experimental purpose. The study considers the combined deactivation effect due to sulphur poisoning and fouling due to carbon deposition. Four different cases with respect to the introduction and removal of H2S are considered. The rate of deactivation due to simultaneous carbon deposition and sulphur poisoning is much faster than the individual poisoning processes. The catalyst shows almost stable operation for 6 h without the presence of urn:x-wiley:00084034:media:cjce24266:cjce24266-math-0001 in the feed stream. From the conversion studies, it appears that the pre-treatment of catalyst samples with H2S leads to negligible sulphur coverage. The sulphur poisoning effect is also found to be reversible.Item Techniques for Overcoming Sulfur Poisoning of Catalyst Employed in Hydrocarbon Reforming(Springer, 2021-08-07) Srinivas, AppariSulfur poisoning of catalyst is a well-known phenomenon observed during the production of syngas (CO + H2). The presence of traces of sulfur content in the feedstock can drastically reduce the catalyst activity and life. Several measures have been developed over the years to mitigate the catalyst deactivation process due to sulfur poisoning. In this paper, we review literature from 1996-present related to all the developments made for sulfur-resistant systems. The basis of poisoning being the sulfur content in the feedstock, potential fuel-containing feedstocks for syngas production were briefly discussed. The basics of sulfur poisoning mechanisms are also summarized. Then, a framework consisting of sulfur tolerance methodologies were discussed. In particular, we have discussed: (i) catalyst development by altering catalyst composition and support systems, (ii) influence of using catalyst structures, (iii) process modifications and optimization, (iv) desulfurization techniques for removal of sulfur from feed and/or product streams, and (v) effective catalyst regeneration techniques to extend the catalyst life. This review emphasizes the integration of the best set of methods to develop sulfur tolerance strategies.