BITS Faculty Publications
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://localhost:4000/handle/123456789/1867
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Properties of fly ash geopolymer modified with red mud and silica fume: a comparative study(Springer, 2020-10) Srivastava, AnshumanAlkali-activated geopolymer has emerged as a sustainable alternative to highly polluting conventional cement. The present paper investigates the activation of fly ash-based geopolymer paste modified by red mud and silica fume. Three geopolymer mixes are considered: (1) fly ash; (2) fly ash—red mud; and (3) fly ash—silica fume. Mass proportions of modifiers in the respected mixes varied by 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% of total binder. Heat curing (60 °C) provided for 24 h just after casting. Alkaline activator consists of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions. Workability results reveal that both red mud and silica fume triggered the reduction in workability with the later one had a greater impact. A flash set was obtained with the silica fume content of more than 15%. Both the modifiers cause a decrease in the setting time at ambient temperature, and silica fume proved to be more productive with the reduction of more than 65% of setting time. Mixes containing red mud exhibit slightly higher density. Water absorption of fly ash geopolymer increases with red mud. Compressive strength increases with the addition of modifiers, and geopolymer containing silica fume possesses the highest compressive strength among the three mixes considered. Compressive strength exhibited a linear correlation with molar ratios (Si/Al and Na/Si) of source materials. XRD and SEM methods showed that the geopolymerization reaction is affected by the red mud and silica fume. It is recommended that the flash set and setting time at higher contents of modifiers must be examined for the design of a modified geopolymer mix.Item Experimental investigation on paver blocks of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete containing silica fume(Taylor & Francis, 2021-12) Srivastava, AnshumanUtilisation of geopolymer may reduce the global warming potential of concrete. This study examines geopolymer concrete as interlocking paver blocks. Three concretes are compared: conventional cement, fly ash-geopolymer and fly ash–silica fume geopolymer. Sodium hydroxide solution is used in both geopolymer concretes, and sodium silicate solution is used in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete only. Rectangle and uni shape blocks are tested for compressive strength, flexural strength, abrasion resistance and freeze–thaw resistance. Dynamic drop loading test is conducted on block pavement with herringbone laying pattern . Results revealed that resistance to abrasion and water absorption of geopolymeris improved by adding silica fume . Freeze–thaw resistance is the lowest for cement concrete paver blocks. Lowest deflection occurred in block pavement of uni shape. Geopolymer concrete provides uniform load distribution than cement concrete. Cement concrete is slightly costlier than geopolymer concrete. This study concluded the geopolymer as suitable option for paver block applicationsItem Environmental impact assessment of fly ash and silica fume based geopolymer concrete(Elsevier, 2020-05) Sangwan, Kuldip Singh; Srivastava, AnshumanAlkali activated geopolymer is an attractive solution to limit the adverse consequences of cement manufacturing. In this paper, an evaluation of environmental impacts of geopolymer containing fly ash and silica fume is conducted. Life cycle assessment is performed by benchmarking the environmental impacts of three geopolymer concrete mixes against the conventional cement concrete, namely: fly ash geopolymer (with hydroxide and silicate of sodium); fly ash–silica fume blend geopolymer (with hydroxide and silicate of sodium); and fly ash–silica fume blend geopolymer (with sodium hydroxide). Impact analysis is performed by using ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint methods in life cycle assessment software UMBERTO NXT using database of Ecoinvent 3.0. Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the effect of transportation. One mix design for each concrete of equal water to binder ratio and 28-days compressive strength of more than 35 MPa is analysed. Results of life cycle assessment indicate that alkaline activators and cement are the major sources of negative environmental impacts for geopolymer and cement concrete, respectively. Global warming potential of geopolymer concretes is lower than conventional cement concrete. Fly ash–silica fume geopolymer concrete activated without sodium silicate has lowest environmental impacts. Transportation of raw materials is found to increase the overall negative of all four concrete mixes. Cost reduction of 10.87%–17.77% per unit volume is achieved with the use of fly ash – silica fume based geopolymer concrete. Sustainability in terms of cost and environmental benefits of geopolymer concrete can be further increased by using silica fume. It can be concluded that the use of fly ash – silica fume blended geopolymer in the construction industry has huge possibility to improve its sustainability. Furthermore, waste management can be effectively done by utilization of industrial by-products in concrete.Item Environmental impact assessment of fly ash and silica fume based geopolymer concrete(Elsevier, 2020-05) Srivastava, Anshuman; Sangwan, Kuldip SinghAlkali activated geopolymer is an attractive solution to limit the adverse consequences of cement manufacturing. In this paper, an evaluation of environmental impacts of geopolymer containing fly ash and silica fume is conducted. Life cycle assessment is performed by benchmarking the environmental impacts of three geopolymer concrete mixes against the conventional cement concrete, namely: fly ash geopolymer (with hydroxide and silicate of sodium); fly ash–silica fume blend geopolymer (with hydroxide and silicate of sodium); and fly ash–silica fume blend geopolymer (with sodium hydroxide). Impact analysis is performed by using ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint methods in life cycle assessment software UMBERTO NXT using database of Ecoinvent 3.0. Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the effect of transportation. One mix design for each concrete of equal water to binder ratio and 28-days compressive strength of more than 35 MPa is analysed. Results of life cycle assessment indicate that alkaline activators and cement are the major sources of negative environmental impacts for geopolymer and cement concrete, respectively. Global warming potential of geopolymer concretes is lower than conventional cement concrete. Fly ash–silica fume geopolymer concrete activated without sodium silicate has lowest environmental impacts. Transportation of raw materials is found to increase the overall negative of all four concrete mixes. Cost reduction of 10.87%–17.77% per unit volume is achieved with the use of fly ash – silica fume based geopolymer concrete. Sustainability in terms of cost and environmental benefits of geopolymer concrete can be further increased by using silica fume. It can be concluded that the use of fly ash – silica fume blended geopolymer in the construction industry has huge possibility to improve its sustainability. Furthermore, waste management can be effectively done by utilization of industrial by-products in concrete.