Debye screening versus Gauss law in electrostatics: Finite size effects

dc.contributor.authorMishra, Madhukar
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T08:34:28Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T08:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2007-10
dc.description.abstractWe revisit the well-known topics of self- and induced-screening in an otherwise isotropic neutral plasma/colloid. It is pointed out that the standard Debye–Hückel (DH) theory (ignoring finite size effects) suffers from many ambiguities related to net ionic numbers, total charge of the system, role of the electrostatic Gauss law, short-distance behaviour of the potential and incorrectly normalized pair correlation functions. We give a new formulation (incorporating finite size effects) such that ionic numbers are maintained, the total charge of the system has physically correct value, the Gauss law boundary conditions are rigorously obeyed, short-distance behaviour of the potential is guaranteed automatically, and correlation functions are correctly normalized. Numerical differences between the two approaches show up if the screening length μ−1 becomes comparable to the size R of the system.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843710700622X
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/xmlui/handle/123456789/14253
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.subjectDebye screeningen_US
dc.subjectPlasma/colloiden_US
dc.subjectPoisson equationen_US
dc.subjectGauss lawen_US
dc.subjectBoltzmann distributionen_US
dc.titleDebye screening versus Gauss law in electrostatics: Finite size effectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: