Unpacking inconsistencies in the NIRF rankings

dc.contributor.authorRao, V. Ramgopal
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T10:47:19Z
dc.date.available2025-01-13T10:47:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-10
dc.description.abstractIndia rankings released by the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) since 2016, plays a vital role in the assessment of higher education institutions (HEIs) in the country. While the NIRF rankings aim to enhance transparency and accountability, the present study has identified several inconsistencies, thus raising concerns about their reliability. These include huge fluctuations in the rankings, overemphasis on bibliometrics neglecting non-traditional research outputs, subjective nature of perception rankings that introduces biases, challenges in the regional diversity metric, overlooking teaching quality, inadequate transparency in methodology, questions about data integrity and limited global benchmarking. This study emphasizes on dialogue, refinement and increased transparency to ensure that the NIRF rankings evolve into a reliable benchmark for the diverse landscape of Indian higher education.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv126%2Fi11%2F
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16772
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCurrent Scienceen_US
dc.subjectBibliometric assessmenten_US
dc.subjectHigher Education Institutionsen_US
dc.subjectPerception systemsen_US
dc.subjectRanking fluctuationsen_US
dc.subjectRegional diversityen_US
dc.titleUnpacking inconsistencies in the NIRF rankingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: