Comparative Analysis of ST, ECRL and Static Logic Style at Different Process Technologies

dc.contributor.authorAsati, Abhijit
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T09:19:31Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T09:19:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.description.abstractIn the lower VLSI process technologies, to design the low-power VLSI circuits selection of suitable logic style becomes important to minimize the chip’s power to meet the power density need with minimum sacrifice in the speed. This study’s emphasis is on the design and optimization of digital code converters. To compare propagation delay, power consumption and power delay product (PDP) at 32 nm and 22 nm process technologies, sub-threshold (ST) logic style implementations of Gray code to Binary code (GB), Binary code to Gray code (BG), and BCD code to Excess-3 code (BE3) code converters are used. These implementations are compared with Efficient Charge Recovery Logic (ECRL) and static CMOS logic style implementationsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10080818
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.bits-pilani.ac.in/handle/123456789/16497
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.subjectEEEen_US
dc.subjectAdiabaticen_US
dc.subjectLow poweren_US
dc.subjectECRLen_US
dc.subjectCode convertersen_US
dc.subjectSingle power clocken_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of ST, ECRL and Static Logic Style at Different Process Technologiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: